ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Nikon Coolscan V vs Minolta Elite 5400



Upgrading from Minolta Scan Dual II, I was about to be name brand loyal when
I discovered that there are many who really swear by the Nikon.  That's from
just reading user reviews that are out there at various web sites.

I remember a long time ago on this list reading posts about some issue that
that occurs more often with the Nikon scanners due to the LED light source.
I don't remember what that was, and it may have been resolved by now in any
case.

What I have read is that the software and documentation is better with the
Nikon, lower noise, sharper lens, etc.  The resolution by itself would favor
the 5400, since the Nikon is 4000.

I am interested in your ideas and opinions about this.  My objective is to
print the best 13x19 prints I can print on an Epson 2200 on W/C paper using
PS-CS and Zeiss, shooting negative film.

Berry

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.