ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: NikonScan negative question (was Dynamicrangequestion)



> > That isn't true with Gain adjustments, is it?  I thought it
> > causes the scan
> > to "delay" over the slide so that the raw data had more actual
> > light in it.
>
> Yes, it does. If you fiddle the "analog gain" in NikonScan, the scan time
> changes, along with the pitch of the stepper motor. And that's
> exactly what
> you'd want it to do, since the main noise source is the CCD itself.

Hi Paul,

I believe most call that exposure time, not gain.  I believe their naming
creates confusion.

BTW, why would the stepper motor pitch change (if you mean pitch as it
relates to distance, not to sound...if it relates to sound, then, well,
forget I asked ;-), which I assume, means it changes resolution?

Regards,

Austin


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.