[filmscanners] RE: Compact Cameras

["Laurie Solomon" <Laurie@advancenet.net>]

I am familiar with it and have heard good things about it from users; BUT
that is one of the sorts of things that I consider as the EXTRA WORK
required to remedy the issues I am speaking of. :-)  First, I believe that
you almost need to have a dedicated printer for B & W printing to use it:
second you need to use special inksets.  Third, even if you do not choose to
use the CIS but stick with carts so as to be able to switch easily between
B&W and color, you need to flush the system of the previous inks in the
printer prior to each changing back and forth from B&W to color.

Another more expensive option which I am told helps to remedy the issues is
to purchase a RIP to use with the printer instead of the printer's driver.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> lotusm50@sprynet.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: laurie@advancenet.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
>
> You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
> system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com).  It is really amazing.   No
> bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and long
> tonal scale.  It is really, really very good.
>
>
> LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> ><snip>
> >
> >First, even at today's stage in technology, I do not find
> digital black
> >and white to be all that satisfactory be it captured with a digital
> >camera or scanned in via a scanner.  I find that both the monitor
> >displaying and the hard copy printing of digital black & white to be
> >full of problems that result in much additional work to correct or
> >minimize or in less than satisfactory quality.  Issues such as the
> >ability of dye based inkjet prints or pigmented inkjet
> prints to render
> >the images with true rich blacks with little bronzing or metemerism
> >with clean neutral whites without warm or cold color casts, the
> >tendency to emphasize grain structure, aliasing, and noise when
> >rendering the image, and the frequent exhibiting of color
> artifacts in
> >the form of stray color pixels that appear.  To be sure,
> some of this
> >will be found with B&W film based captures that are scanned and
> >reproduced just as it is with the digital camera captures
> since these
> >issues seem to revolve around the rendering and reproduction stages
> >rather than the capture stages; but I have found the
> problems easier to
> >deal with when scanning B&W films and rendering them into monitor
> >displays and prints than is the case with digital camera captures.
> >This is especially true given that there are a number of
> varying film
> >types and speeds to use that are better for different
> subjects and scan
> >with differing results with respect to some of the problems
> mentioned
> >like emphasis of grain structure, aliasing, and noise which
> is not true
> >for digital camera unless one has an arsenal of different digital
> >cameras to select from that use different sensors in
> different configurations.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> message title or body
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005
>
>

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body