On 09/06/2007 James L. Sims wrote:
> I think that digital imaging definitely has a place in this list,
> Tony.
> I have confidence in and great respect for the core group of this
> list.
> Digital imaging, film scanning and digicams are still evolving. Just
> some of the issues are RAW file converters, practical limits of pixel
> density - have we reached it? How much do we really need? And the
> digital archiving issues, just to name a few. I think you have a blue
> ribbon group contained in this list, Tony.
>
> Please keep it going,
I am amazed to see it leap back into life, it saves me worrying that the
server has clagged:)
I'm happy to let it mutate to accomodate changed conditions, though I
wouldn't want to see it become a minor and pointless clone of [prodig].
--
Regards
Tony Sleep
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
