ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography



On 10/06/2007 Arthur Entlich wrote:
> However, the evolution in digital is rapidly reaching the
> point where the current technology is more than adequate for most
> people
> until that camera fails to work.

I read this week that the leading 8 mfrs of digital cameras expect to sell
89m cameras during 2007, up 18% on the previous year.

Few digital compacts seem to be engineered to last more than 2-3 years,
Even with recycling that's a lot of landfill.

It's only a matter of time before we see $20 disposable digicams with
built in memory, battery and cheap CMOS sensor. The surviving
photofinishing trade will love them, as they'll be designed as drop-off
and get back prints (chosen at a console) and a DVD.

So I think that's a perfect excuse to buy a Leica M8 and save the planet :)

--
Regards

Tony Sleep
http://tonysleep.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.