ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography



On 15/06/2007 Henk de Jong wrote:
> I think the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens is also not bad, but a big
> draw
> back is the rotating frontlens when focussing. At least that is what
> Canon
> support tells me. A big handicap when using (Cokin) filters like
> polariser
> or half-coloured ones.

They misinformed you! I have one here and the front does not rotate on the
EF 50mm f1.4 USM, it simply extends and retracts a little. The same as
every other EF lens I've ever used. And yes, the 50 f1.4 is a nice lens.

--
Regards

Tony Sleep
http://tonysleep.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.