But a pixel is around 6um on a side, so grain is finer than a pixel.
R. Jackson wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
<snip>
Look here:
>
>
>
> See the 400x magnification? If that level of capture detail existed
> in your film scans and you had no issues with aliasing I think it
> would be pretty significant. The files will be enormous, though, and
> you'd have to really enjoy the artifacts of the medium to even
> bother. I'd bother, though. I imagine it will be another decade
> before that kind of technology is accessible to people for fine arts
> use in any practical sense, but I'll be at the head of the line.
>
> -Rob
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
