Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
- From: "Berry Ives" <yvesberia@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:20:31 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 01:20:41 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;b=jF8I0+3I/6OZO7Y0CGzF0mhLZcPCAyl4vJc384jYm5RsF/bH8w1IjJWEBINmy18V;h=Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Envelope-to: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
- In-reply-to: <00e001c7bf5e$603a6820$0200a8c0@Koko>
- List-post: <mailto:filmscanners@halftone.co.uk> (No HTML, plain text only)
- List-subscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Subscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Unsubscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
- Thread-index: Ace/Y3ZBtMRQmCtWEdyxVgAUUS+0xg==
- Thread-topic: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
On 7/5/07 5:44 PM, "David J. Littleboy" <davidjl@gol.com> wrote:
> The 4/3 sensor is 1/4 the area of the FF sensors, and not really a serious
> format. If one is concerned with image quality.
I think that for you to say this is equivalent, in the film world, of saying
that 35mm cameras are not really a serious format.
Berry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
