Based upon what you are shooting, you don't need "reach" you need a spy
satellite ;-)
It all comes down to how much you want to pay, how much weight yo want
to lug, and how long the lenses are you wish to carry. Have you
considered a Telescope?
Art
gary wrote:
>I'm a person that needs "reach", if you define reach as getting shots of
>distance objects. Now generally a person who needs reach is using a
>telephoto lens and possibly combined with a teleconverter. Such a setup
>doesn't put out a lot of light, so the bigger pixels are certainly an
>advantage. Also, I've been told that even if noise was not an issue, you
>can't simply keep reducing the pixel pitch due to difficulties in lens
>design. If anything, a 10um pitch would be optimal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
