ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: SCSI support on a Mac Pro



On 11/02/2008 Laurie@advancenet.net wrote:
> USB2 is just as
> robust if not more so than Firewire; it was USB 1.1 which was not as
> robust
> as Firewire.

Yup, nothing wrong with USB2 (so long as it's not plugged and unplugged
too many times). I have lots of USB and no FW in use, never had an issue.
But somewhere I read that Firewire<->SCSI adapters were an easier and
simpler engineering prospect, and potentially less prone to driver issues
than USB2<->SCSI, because FW and SCSI were releated protocols. That's not
to say there are problems with USB2<->SCSI in practice, of course.

--
Regards

Tony Sleep
http://tonysleep.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.