On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:44:49PM +0300, Vladimir Litovka wrote:
>Hi,
>
> а насколько велик риск столкнуться с фильтрованием блоков сетей, меньших
> чем minimum allocation для диапазона? Сталкивался кто-то с таким подходом
> вживую или это только страшная теория? Я хочу из /18 выделить кусок /23 и
> думаю - не будет-ли это где-то цинично зафильтровано?
Вот кусок старого Weekly Routing Table Report (http://www.apnic.net/stats/bgp):
Analysis Summary
----------------
BGP routing table entries examined: 107865
Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 71870
Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 51605
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12551
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10860
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4759
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1691
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 55
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 5.4
Max AS path length visible: 19
Illegal AS announcements present in the Routing Table: 2
Non-routable prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0
Prefixes being announced from the IANA Reserved Address blocks: 14
Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1172878088
Equivalent to 69 /8s, 232 /16s and 179 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced: 31.6
Percentage of allocated address space announced: 59.9
Percentage of available address space allocated: 52.8
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71809
обратите внимание на первую и последнюю цифры. Селяви :-(
AFAIK при нормально созданном route-object-е вплоть до /24 в фильтр попасть
сложно.
--
Regards,
Vladimir.
=============================================================================
"inet-admins" Internet access mailing list. Maintained by East Connection ISP.
Mail "unsubscribe inet-admins" to Majordomo@info.east.ru if you want to quit.
Archive is accessible on http://info.east.ru/rus/inetadm.html