Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)

To: "'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'" <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
From: "Shough, Dean" <dean.shough@lmco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:08:03 -0700
Content-return: allowed
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

> There are two factors that decrease the resolution of the red channel.
> Smear and bloom.  
>

And chromatic aberrations.  Especially if the scanner does not properly
block the IR light.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
  - From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Magnification of light
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Previous by thread: RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread