Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:09:01 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <005c01c0f879$42818690$b57ba8c0@athalon>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

> The
> Nikon scan has a lot more shadow detail.

And you can tell that from a 72DPI web photo?

I can't imagine that anyone can accurately judge tonality and scan quality
from 72PPI JPEG web image displayed on a who knows what monitor!

Actual pixel clips are certainly usable for some criteria.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
  - From: "Moreno Polloni" <mp@dccnet.com>

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
  - From: "Moreno Polloni" <mp@dccnet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: GEM
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread