Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:50:31 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <B755939E.2A83%soho@eircom.net>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

> I've been thinking about the Nikon 4000ED too, so it was
> interesting for me
> to see the comparison.

I have to agree with Rafe that it really wasn't a very good comparison.
Don't base your decision on a couple of JPEG 72PPI web images!

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
  - From: Richard <soho@eircom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: what defines this quality?
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread