Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Scanner & printer
"Op's" <martin@wollongong.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Have a look at the Minolta Scan Multi Pro
It looks to me that the Multi Pro is the best 35mm scanner available, but
that it's behind the 8000 for MF work. (I was particularly disturbed by the
noise ("grain") in the examples discussed here a while ago.)
> > Which printer should I could consider if I want to print al least A3?
It seems to be between the Canon 9000 (dye-based inks) and the pigment ink
Epson 2100, 2200, or 4000 (same printer: the only difference is where you
buy it). The Canon (as I understand it) doesn't do full-bleed A3. However,
I'm finding the Epson 950C _very_ slow for full-bleed A4 (20 to 25 minutes),
and probably should have bought the Canon 900. Sigh. (I whimped out on A3
this time around since I really don't have space for it (my wife said shut
up and buy it<g>.)). They're enourmous. Also, since I haven't bitten the
bullet and purchased the 8000, I don't have A3 quality images yet.)
David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
