Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Color spaces for different purposes
I support Ken. I'm currently scanning a large number of rolls of negative
film. They are just 10x.6.67 inch by 72 ppi images for screen display. I'm
keeping them in an electronic catalog of my images. Unless something has
changed in Photo Shop 7, which I recently acquired, sharpening is much more
noticeable on these small JPEGs than on 27MB TIFFs that I use for printing
or creating slides. I would like to emphasize the word "visible" in Ken's
question.
Don
At 10:22 AM 09/06/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Ken writes:
>
>> ... but could someone offer a technical explanation
>> of why sharpening has so much more visible effect
>> on jpegs as opposed to TIFFs?
>
>It doesn't.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
