ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Kodachrome green / scanner colorimetry



There's a big difference between the Nikon and the Minolta, though. I
believe the Nikon uses tri-colored LEDs and monochrome sensors, while the
Minolta uses a white light source and tri-colored sensors. Either system
could have gaps in its spectral response, but there's no reason to believe
that they'd necessarily have the same gaps.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Bob Frost
>
> I seem to remember Nikon saying that Kodachromes did not scan well because
> of the different nature of the dyes in this film. This is quite separate
> from the ICE problem with Kodachromes. I have many old Kodachromes going
> back to the early 60's and they take a lot of correction in PS to get the
> colors right. On the other hand Fuji Provia 100 F scans
> beautifully - hardly any corrections needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.