ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re:shoot first, fix it later


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re:shoot first, fix it later
  • From: "Tim Schooler" <tschooler@cox-internet.com>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:12:42 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <20021128004417.QJVU8909.fe1@wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 12:00 AM 11/28/2002 +0000, you wrote:


>I think it's perfectly valid to "shoot first, fix later"  if that's the
>most expedient way to get it done


For amateurs (and there are good amateur photographers), perhaps it doesn't
matter.
If you're billing someone for the work, then you should take the time to
shoot it
right. If you goof, then you deal with fixing it later.



>- Say you need a quarter page image of a particular tall building--does it
>make more sense to shoot a consumer digital and fix the perspective in
>Photoshop, or dragout the 4 x 5 so you have shifts for perspective control?



This must be a rhetorical question. Obviously the answer is use a lens with
perspective control.



        Best Regards,

        Tim Schooler

http://www.timschooler.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.