ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: New Epson 3200 Photo



It'll be interesting to see what real resolution of the new Epson delivers
under testing.  Can flatbed optics actually deliver the equiv. of a 3200
dpi filmscanner?  Or will the 2700-2800dpi class of filmscanners have it
beat?  (I'd bet on the latter).

Lloyd's got a good point about the limits of the tranny lid.  If only it
were larger....

Bob G

   At 03:24 PM 11/27/2002, you wrote:

>If the nitwits had enlarged that tranny lid from 4x9 to at least 8x10 to
>make contact sheets possible, I'd have that scanner. I don't know any
>photographer having 20-30 rolls of negs to proof that wants to scan a
>single 120 strip or perhaps 2-3 35mm strips at a time. As it stands,
>I'll keep my Powerlook III.
>
>I'm disappointed, because I just upgraded to a Sprintscan 4000 Plus. If
>the Epson scanner had the larger tranny lid, I would have bought it and
>not needed both firewire and SCSI cards in my system. :(
>
>Lloyd
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.