ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Fri 29 Nov, 2002



On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 01:58:49AM -0000, Nuno Sebasti?o wrote:
> >is there any reason to choose the nikon 4000 over the canon 4000?  the
> nikon is more expensive, but includes a firewire >connection.  the canon
> usb connection is only 1.1 i think, not the faster 2.0 (i could be wrong
> about that).
> The canon also supports the use of a scsi interface (very fast!!).
> In terms of quality it has some advantages over the nikon like the 14
> bit adc (12 in nikon).

I'm sure the LS-4000 also has a 14-bit DAC.

> I own one for a year now and I'm quite glad with it. You can see some
> results at www.sebastiao.com (requires fast connection).
>
>
> Nuno sebastiao
> -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
>
--
Tony Terlecki
ajt@mrps.demon.co.uk
Running Debian/GNU 3.0 Linux

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.