ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)



In article <memo.20010206131143.52985E@tsphoto.cix.co.uk>, 
TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep) wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:06 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)  Derek Clarke 
> (derek_c@cix.co.uk) wrote:
> 
> > What does the phrase "Plus X does not reveal grain" mean?
> 
> Not alegbra;) Plus-X is a Kodak ISO125 B&W film.

I knew that :-)

But whether or not a scan of a particular resolution accurately captures 
the film grain or instead causes those grain-like artifacts is the issue.

Claim Plus-X has no grain and I won't believe you! 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.