Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:56 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <memo.20010212184733.38985C@derek_c.compulink.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:47 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)  Derek Clarke 
(derek_c@cix.co.uk) wrote:

> But whether or not a scan of a particular resolution accurately captures 
> the film grain or instead causes those grain-like artifacts is the issue.

True. I haven't tried this emulsion.

> Claim Plus-X has no grain and I won't believe you! 

You won't catch me out that easily:)


Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & 
comparisons

References:
- RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
  - From: derek_c@cix.co.uk (Derek Clarke)

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan w/ Illford b&w
Previous by thread: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Next by thread: Odp: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread