ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Acer or Nikon?



Sorry Michael but a 1000 dollar 3.3 megapixel certainly is not high
end,sadly.
A back for a hasselblad with the new Kodak 48mb chip will set you back
around 20,000 US dollars ,that's not bad for a single shot job,quality
that is ,not price.
the rest of your comments are right on.
regards.
Michael Wilkinson. 106 Holyhead Road,Ketley, Telford.Shropshire TF 15 DJ
  michael@infocus-photography.co.uk      www.infocus-photography.co.uk
For Trannies and Negs from Digital Files
################################
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Moore" <miguelmas@qwest.net>


: I disagree that a high end digital camera (which will cost at least
US$1000 to
: get 3.3 MP and that still doesn't approach the information even a
Scanwit can





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.