ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: dither vs haltoning nitpicking



> As I mentioned, it is a
> > common mis-statement to say that your monitor has a resolution of
> > 1280x1024,
> > when that is not a resolution.
>
> Then, pray tell, what is it? We so casually say, "Well, I think
> I'll change
> the resolution of my monitor today." Funny how we all know
> exactly what that
> means!

I know, I know!  I've had this discussion with a number of monitor designers
over the years...and it drives them nuts that people call it 'resolution'.
I don't remember what they did call it though...I'll go look it up if I
still have the thread saved.

Point is, it isn't technically resolution, as resolution is per unit per
(typically linear) dimension (and, one monitor's width isn't a measurement
dimension ;-).




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.