ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: File sizes, file formats, etc. for printing 8.5 x 11and 13 x



I could throw the art of high-speed color Rotogravure in here, where the
mechanically-screened "dots" are all the same size but of different
intensities, much like pixels on a CRT or LCD--but it probably wouldn't add
much. This is one of those discussions where everybody's right! ;-)

Best regards--LRA

>>      ... and I would still argue that stoichastic or random dithering is
>> NOT an implimentation of halftoning ... that is, this implimentation
>> of dithering does not vary the dot size, rather the number and
>> placement of dots.

> That is where we disagree.  I believe that it is the effect that is
halftoning...and how you arrive at that effect does not mean it still isn't
halftoning.  I think I've made that really clear that is my belief ;-)

<clip>


-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.