Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

["IronWorks" <ironworks@ameritech.net>]

Which would be a reason for dual-boot systems, of course.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Laurie Solomon" <laurie@advancenet.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?


| My understanding is that Win2K is a replacement upgrade for Win NT.  It
| would be most useful to those who utilize large networks.  It supposedly
is
| more stable than Win 98, 98SE, and ME; but it does not cupport the range
of
| drivers that are supported under the other versions - at least not yet.
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
| Bigboy9955@aol.com
| Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:17 AM
| To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
| W98SE?
|
|
| In a message dated 03/07/2001 6:42:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
| harper@wordweb.com writes:
|
| << Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K
all
|  use the same colour management system.
|
|  Rob >>
|
|
| I was just getting ready to run out and spend $350 (?) on Win2K when I
| already have WinMe.  What are the advantages to the 2K "pro" version
besides
| the letters on the box?  And who is it useful to?
| Ed
|