ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



My understanding is that Win2K is a replacement upgrade for Win NT.  It
would be most useful to those who utilize large networks.  It supposedly is
more stable than Win 98, 98SE, and ME; but it does not cupport the range of
drivers that are supported under the other versions - at least not yet.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
Bigboy9955@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:17 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?


In a message dated 03/07/2001 6:42:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
harper@wordweb.com writes:

<< Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K all
 use the same colour management system.

 Rob >>


I was just getting ready to run out and spend $350 (?) on Win2K when I
already have WinMe.  What are the advantages to the 2K "pro" version besides
the letters on the box?  And who is it useful to?
Ed




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.