ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



Ed wrote:
>I was just getting ready to run out and spend $350 (?) on Win2K when I

>already have WinMe.  What are the advantages to the 2K "pro" version
> besides the letters on the box?  And who is it useful to?

o Better memory management
o less likely to crash (NT/Win2K has a much more stable kernel)
o Designed for heavy duty apps

It's more useful to professionals, and should run things like Photoshop
better than other versions of Windows (should may be the operative word).
 The reliability of NT/Win2K is amazing as far as uptime is concerned.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.