ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



WinMe is just Win98SE with more bells and whistles and a MS's limited
version of a GoBack program.  It's a fancier park, whereas Win2K is a
rehabbed/rebuilt park.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?


| Ed wrote:
| >I was just getting ready to run out and spend $350 (?) on Win2K when I
|
| >already have WinMe.  What are the advantages to the 2K "pro" version
| > besides the letters on the box?  And who is it useful to?
|
| o Better memory management
| o less likely to crash (NT/Win2K has a much more stable kernel)
| o Designed for heavy duty apps
|
| It's more useful to professionals, and should run things like Photoshop
| better than other versions of Windows (should may be the operative word).
|  The reliability of NT/Win2K is amazing as far as uptime is concerned.
|
| Rob
|
|
| Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
| http://wordweb.com
|
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.