ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Clarity! Dual Monitor Hell (Heaven!)



Laurie knows best - I don't use PhotoShop.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Laurie Solomon" <laurie@advancenet.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Clarity! Dual Monitor Hell (Heaven!)


| >As for the difference in images between the two monitors, the first thing
| to
| >do is to calibrate both monitors.
|
| I agree 100%
|
| >If I am not mistaken, Adobe has within it a calibration mechanism from
| there on.
|
| Here I have to disagree at least in so far as Win 98 is concerned.  On
| systems using Win 98 and 98SE, only the primary monitor can be calibrated
| using Adobe or any operating system calibration features.  The secondary
| monitor display has to be calibrated by means of the monitor's hardware
| adjustments.  White point temperature settings, gammas, and phosphors
| identification and settings can only be set via software for the primary
| monitor.  This, as I understand it, is a limitation of the OS.  Since
color
| management and the use of device dependent color profiles is also governed
| by the OS, color management tends to apply only to the primary monitor as
| well and not to the secondary monitor.  Hence one cannot apply color
| management via profiles across monitors if you are using different makes
and
| types of monitors, when both monitors are operating simultaneously. the
| primary monitor's profile governs both monitors.
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of IronWorks
| Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:48 PM
| To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Clarity! Dual Monitor Hell (Heaven!)
|
|
| Embedding profiles in your images is a topic in and of itself - I would
you
| suggest you first read Dan Margulis's Professional Photoshop book first (I
| don't know if the book is out for 6 yet or not).
|
| As for the difference in images between the two monitors, the first thing
to
| do is to calibrate both monitors.  You can set the black point using the
| information at http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/calibration/index.htm
|
| If I am not mistaken, Adobe has within it a calibration mechanism from
there
| on.
|
| Maris
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Robert Logan" <rl@dmu.ac.uk>
| To: <Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
| Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 7:28 PM
| Subject: filmscanners: Clarity! Dual Monitor Hell (Heaven!)
|
|
| |
| | Ok, Ive been on this list for some time now, and understand most
| | of the technical stuff (Im a computing lecturer so that side of
| | things is easy). However, Ive just got Photoshop 6, and a
| | Dualhead Matrox Card - with two monitors - one old 20 inch
| | heavy use, and one new 17 inch shiny new!
| |
| | Ive just realised to my great pleasure that dual monitor
| | setups are fantastic - but Ive also realised that the tweaking
| | that Ive been doing to scans on my old screen mean nothing.
| | To my horror they transform themselves to a whole new
| | image on the new screen. Ugh - drag an image from one to
| | the other and BOOM - it changes dramatically. When you see it
| | head to head you realise that it makes a real difference.
| |
| | Now heres my question - what do I need to do to keep the best
| | archival quality image data in terms of profile embedding?
| | Any preferences out there or is it safe to go with the Adobe
| | ones ... hints tips et al welcomed.
| |
| | bert
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.