ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?





Quoton wrote:


> If your mainboard is 133MHz capable you really should take all the
> advantage of it now. My Minolta scanner took nearly 2 minutes to scan
> a 35mm frame at full resolution on my pC-100 system (dual 550MHz CPU,
> 512MB PC-100 SDRAM) but with my newly assembled 933MHz single CPU 512MB
> PC-133 SDRAM machine the same scanner takes only 45 seconds to scan a
> frame now. What a difference! Minolta's spec says 45 seconds. I thought
> it was a hoax. It turns out it is real.
> 
> Quoton

Don't you mean "it turns out to be real... expensive... to get that spec 
out of it ;-)

I wasn't planning on spending the cost of the scanner a second time to 
get it to run at the speced speed, by having to buy a 933MHz processor 
and 512MB of PC133 memory...  but I will probably go to a 6XX Mhz 
Pentium III with something like 384MB memory.

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.