ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners



How cheap is the Fuji?  I usually buy 36 exposure Supra 100ASA for about
$2.89 USD. And, once again, it may not be optimized for scanning, but Supra
100ASA scans very well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners


> Michael wrote:
> >Rob writes ...
> >> Someone mentioned Supra 400.  I wish someone would produce
> >> a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!
> >    Supra 100 (!?)
>
> It's been claimed here that only Supra 400 is a new formulaiton
specifically
> optimised for scanning.  Supra 100 is apparently a previous emulsion
rebadged?
> As far as apparent grain in sky is concerned, I haven't found Supra 100
> to have any advantage over Fuji Superia 100 and the Fuji film is LOTS
cheaper.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
> http://wordweb.com
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.