Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 14:18:36 +1000
In-reply-to: <000b01c0d1df$a3639ae0$377e45cf@m5>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

Edwni wrote:
>How cheap is the Fuji?  I usually buy 36 exposure Supra 100ASA for about
>$2.89 USD. And, once again, it may not be optimized for scanning, but Supra
>100ASA scans very well.

I can get Fuji Superia 24 (not 36) for about US$1.50.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
  - From: "Edwin Eleazer" <ee907@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Scan for television screen
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread