The Supra line is supposedly 'optimized' for scanning, but I read somewhere
on these newsgroups (I can't cite chapter or verse) that the primary
'optimization' consists of extra protection against scratches as opposed to
improved grain.
I did also take a roll of Kodak Portra VC 160, and it scanned fairly well.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@attglobal.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
| Supra 100? Am I missing something?
|
| Tom
|
| P.S. I'm actually not blown away with Supra. I prefer Fuji in my SS4000
|
| > Maris wrote:
| > > Slide film is generally less grainy than print film
| > > in scanning sky. Have you found any good print film for sky?
| >
| > Someone mentioned Supra 400. I wish someone would produce
| > a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!
| >
| > Rob
| >
| >
| >
| > Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
