Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED
From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 02:34:12 -0700
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <3B1FDE1B.25632CD2@jbic.com> <002801c0efc8$8e937520$0100a8c0@sun>



AR Studio wrote:

>

> Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower.
> 
> Does that help?
> 
> Helen + Andrew

Well, That's disappointing.  I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-)

Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then.

Art

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED
  - From: jm1209 <jm1209@jbic.com>

References:
- filmscanners: CANON FS4000US
  - From: jm1209 <jm1209@jbic.com>
- Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED
  - From: "AR Studio" <info@ar-studio.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: 24bit - 48bit dilemma & Work flow suggestions
Next by Date: re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread