ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED



i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it 
seems that i always wait for the next improved version  of many computer
products and they wind up not being all that much better. 
the nikon has a better advertised dynamic range but less resolution.
possibly this may be a better combination anyway.
i am a new to this film scanner business and hope more people respond
with their opinions.
thanks
jim

Arthur Entlich wrote:
> 
> AR Studio wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Helen + Andrew
> 
> Well, That's disappointing.  I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-)
> 
> Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then.
> 
> Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.