ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A=20filmscanners=3A=20Was=20New=20Nikon=20per



On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:47:39 +1000  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?= 
(harper@wordweb.com) wrote:

> 
> I was under the impression that there was little if any
> difference between the current generation Superia 100
> and Reala.  When Fuji announced the extra colour layer,
> it seemed to point to the same technology.  Can anyone
> confirm this?

I may be hallucinating, but I have used both quite a lot and consider 
Reala negs lower contrast and more neutral on skin tone than Superia100.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.