Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:20:32 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <00ff01c11010$047481f0$e4ce0541@cy273717a>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

> It
> sounds like the
> samples aren't completely being reset to zero before another sample is
> taken.
>
> Pat

I am curious exactly what you mean by that?  Where are the samples not being
reset to 0?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory
  - From: Pat Perez <patdperez@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory
  - From: "Pat Perez" <patdperez@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: T400CN was filmscanners: Grain, Noise, et al
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 8000 banding example...
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Scratch the Gear Teeth Theory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread