ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ?



http://www.ledet.com/margulis/articles.html
He expects you to use CMYK but you can see through it.
Bob Wright
----- Original Message -----
From: Norman Unsworth <unsworth_norman@aclink.org>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:37 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ?


> Curves always seems to get the nod as the most sensitive / accurate to
make
> color adjustment. I have to admit I'm terrible at it.
>
> Anyone know of a good online tutorial for working with curves?
>
> Norm Unsworth, Owner
> CS Golf (formerly Clark Systems Custom Golf)
> Outstanding Quality and Value in Custom Golf Equipment
> 609 641 5712
> Please send email to me at: csgolf@home.com
> Visit our Web Site at http://members.home.net/csgolf
>
>
> Lynn writes:
>
> > ... it struck me that adjusting Green in *Levels*
> > would move the blue in "Bear" more toward turquoise
> > and yet leave the white snow  relatively white.
> > And it does.
>
> Curves are better than Levels for this sort of thing.  Levels works kind
of
> like
> curves, but with a fixed shape to the curve, whereas Curves lets you
define
> an
> exact shape of your own.  There are situations in which this is handy, as
> you
> might want to (for example) crank blue in the shadows, but not touch it in
> the
> highlights, or something like that.
>
> > However, these settings can't be saved in PS-LE ...
>
> Sounds like they've removed exactly the stuff that people might want most
> once
> they get used to the product.
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.