At 06:07 19-08-01 +0200, Thys wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <caryenochr@enochsvision.com>
> >
> > Have you actually worked with a Nikon LS-4000? It's a very fine piece of
> > machinery that is easily worth its price. I definitely wouldn't buy on the
> > basis of their name as I've had beefs with Nikon in the past. A few years
> > ago I ditched my Nikon cameras and lenses and replaced them with a couple
> > of Canon EOS1n's and Canon lenses and never looked back. Names don't
> > impress me. Only performance matters. I've never seen a single post on
>this
>
>I haven't used it yet, but will get my hands on one soon, since a friend of
>mine bought one.
>I don't think the issue to me is that it is not a good scanner, but whether
>it is worth paying almost double to some very capable machines that the
>competition is offering.
I agree that's a valid issue. It would all depend on how much you needed
Nikon's ICE^3 features and how well you felt they were implemented as
opposed to Vuescan, for example, on a competitive scanner.
Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
, http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- "Behind all
these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through all things.
The function of art is to reveal this radiance through the created object."
~Joseph Campbell
