Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: OT? - Review on Canon FS4000/film is dead
>Yes. At least from an 'aspiring amateur' viewpoint. More accurately,
>digital cameras with sufficient resloution (ie from about 5 Mp upwards,
>preferably 10) are not within my budget.
See my earlier comments about what a 3.3 MP pic looks like ... camera cost
is ridiculous compared to equiv film model though. About a factor of 4 for
the same features.
>>For me it seems that on the net you can find only extreme opinions (like the
>>one cited above). You can either find statements like "film is already dead"
Only threatened :)
>of the market. As was said in another post, TRY printing a good digital
>image at say 100 dpi and 200 dpi, and then show it to a 'normal' person, ie
What I really said was take a look at an A2 print off a 3.3MP digi. Happens
to be 100 dpi or so. Probably would look a bit mushy as a 10x15 (cm) though.
|
