ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: tiff compression



At 00:02 2001-09-07, you wrote:
Hi all,
 
what do people think about saving my raw scans as LZW tiff's?
I am making 48 bit 6x7 scans on Nikon 8000, and they are over 500Mb each, so lossless compression would save a hell of a lot of space, but what are the drawbacks? can most programmes decode them if I send them to people on a CD?
 
Also, for catalogue/ magazine use what sort of RGB file size should I supply,
something like a 12" print at 300dpi is still 75Gb uncompresses, which seems big for most magazines
 
thanks,
 
Paul

One big drawback when it comes to TIFF's with LZW (especially when you use it for archiving purpose) is that if the compressed file (or media) becomes corrupt, it’s gone forever. Uncompressed image-files however, can be opened and the missing parts of the file will show as noise, the rest will be OK.
/Anders



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.