On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:13:13 +0100 Steve Greenbank
(steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk) wrote:
> One particularly interesting thing about the MacWorld review was that the
> Artixscan had most detail but lots of noise and the Polaroid was
> relatively
> noise free with less detail. As these two machines are effectively the
> same
> it is the scanning software (and possibly the firmware) that produces
> difference between them.
Polaroid's component selection spec is tighter, too, allegedly, so this may
be another factor.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons