ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Scanner Noise (from Dust in Sprintscan 4000?)



On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:13:13 +0100  Steve Greenbank 
(steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk) wrote:

> One particularly interesting thing about the MacWorld review was that the
> Artixscan had most detail but lots of noise and the Polaroid was 
> relatively
> noise free with less detail. As these two machines are effectively the 
> same
> it is the scanning software (and possibly the firmware) that produces
> difference between them.

Polaroid's component selection spec is tighter, too, allegedly, so this may 
be another factor.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
& comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.