Art wrote:
>Common wisdom is that scanning at the highest optical resolution and
>then downsampling via a good program provides better results.
I've found in the past that scanning at a resolution which produces an image
on the screen close to the required size means you can get a sharper jpeg
for web use than scanning at maximum res and resampling. I suggested as
much in this list, but got shouted down. My recent experience has been
that resampling always means I have to sharpen afterwards. As Art suggests
- try both and see what works for you.
Rob
Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
