Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Bruce Fraser Reviews Nikon 4000ED
No! Not any more so than anyone else in the industry. I read a quick post
claiming that the review was good and *objective*. I read it and thought:
this is the same sort of pay-the-bills purveyor-centered review that
typifies the industry reviewing of *everything* from cars to hi-fis, to
sporting goods, etc. It purports to take the consumer into account, but is
mostly about the needs of the purveyors. This just really bugged me at that
moment, so I decided to comment about it.
This was only my opinion, and off the cuff for that matter.
Wire
on 10/3/01 4:19 AM, Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) at
caryenochr@enochsvision.com wrote:
> At 03:32 03-10-01 -0400, you wrote:
>
> So then you're both of the opinion that Bruce Fraser prostituted his
> considerable reputation because the website has to pander to its advertisers?
>
|
