Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Bruce Fraser Reviews Nikon 4000ED
I'm not at all hostile to the 4000 ED. It's just a piece of gear.
I used a LS-2000 for a few years and found it to be very effective. I'm sure
the 4000 ED is an improvement. Bruce likes it; I think... ? I couldn't tell
from his review!
My intention was primarily to challenge someone else's comment about the
Creative Pro article being a good review. I thought others would be more
interested in my position if I backed it up with some thoughts and
observations.
Wire
on 10/3/01 1:16 PM, PAUL GRAHAM at peegee@btinternet.com wrote:
> I've read both his comments and Wire Moores, and the truth is somewhere in
> between. his are written for a major magazine readership, yours, if you will
> excuse me, seem quite hostile to the 4000.
>
>
|