ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.




> Hold on - thanks to you all, maybe I DO understand this.  If scanned
> at 72 dpi, even a 4x6 print would need quite a bit of interpolation to
> get it up to a good screen size, ergo crap.    Is that correct?

No, not interpolation.  Interpolation ADDS data.  Decimation removes data,
so scanning at 72dpi would remove data...if your scanner is 2700DPI and you
scan at 72DPI, you are only using 1 for every 37.5 pixels!

Are you scanning prints?




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.