ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.



Austin Franklin wrote:

> > Hold on - thanks to you all, maybe I DO understand this.  If scanned
> > at 72 dpi, even a 4x6 print would need quite a bit of interpolation to
> > get it up to a good screen size, ergo crap.    Is that correct?
>
> No, not interpolation.  Interpolation ADDS data.  Decimation removes data,
> so scanning at 72dpi would remove data...if your scanner is 2700DPI and you
> scan at 72DPI, you are only using 1 for every 37.5 pixels!

Yeah, but when you finally knock i down to 72 dpi, you're going to discard all 
that info anyway.

Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.