Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
Well, my Canadian dictionary states the first definition as:
"destroy much of, kill a large part of"
The second and third definitions both refer to one-tenth (destroy
one-tenth, or execute one of every ten men).
Pretty violent term for describing removal of some pixels, if you ask
me... I too use downsample and upsample, and I think they both are
easier to understand.
Art
Steve Greenbank wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:56 PM
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
>
>
>
>
>>One of the new features of the upcoming release of Polacolor
>>Insight is the
>>ability to use one of several
>>
>
>>decimation
>>
>
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>
>>techniques from nearest
>>neighbor(lowest quality) to bicubic(highest quality also longer). Your
>>choice would depend on use.
>>David
>>
>
>>David,
>>
>>I'm very impressed! Someone actually used the correct term for this! Will
>>the documentation actually use this term?
>>
>>;-)
>>
>
> Strictly speaking decimation means remove 1 in 10 hence the "dec" so it's
> definitely NOT the correct term even if some illiterate yank coined the
> phrase.
> ;-)
>
> Personally I use down-sample (and up-sample for the reverse).
>
|