ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.



> Pretty violent term for describing removal of some pixels, if you ask
> me...  I too use downsample and upsample, and I think they both are
> easier to understand.
>
> Art

Yes, it's roots seem to be quite violent.  For people who design and work
with digital imaging systems, it's a very common, and understood, term.
People have no problem using interpolate, so why not decimate?  I really don
't believe most people would find decimate is any harder to understand.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.